Here is a list of the top ten tips for making your writing more critical.
To get an idea of what all this means, here are two examples - the first is bad and the second is good.
“Smith (1989, p20) says that, ‘Moreover, there is no cameo appearance by Hitchcock in his last British film Jamaica Inn made in 1938’. This is a reason why Jamaica Inn is not a typical Hitchcock film. Smith (1989, p20) says that, ‘The leading actor in the film was Charles Laughton, but he was also the producer’, so Hitchcock was not free to tell Laughton what to do and how the film should be. So, many people think that it is not a typical Hitchcock film...”
What are some reasons for it being UN-critical writing? Some things It did not do, but should have done, are the following:
Here is a better version of the same paragraph, showing more features of critical writing.
"The 1939 film Jamaica Inn is not a typical Hitchcock film because he probably did not have creative control over it. Normally, Hitchcock had full artistic control of his films, which is why Truffaut (1958) described him as an auteur (literally “author”). It is, therefore, surprising that there are none of Hitchcock’s usual trademarks in this film. The explanation seems to be that the lead actor, Charles Laughton, was also the producer of Jamaica Inn, and therefore had ultimate control over the film. Apart from Black (1967), most authors agree (Smith 1989, p20; Jones 2011) that almost certainly, Hitchcock had to follow Laughton’s vision for the film,. As a result, Hitchcock did not include his usual tropes, such as his signature cameo appearance, in protest about this.”
This is better because:
Click on each of the top ten points at the top of this page to get the details, or click Next at the bottom of the page to go through them all one-by-one.